So Thursday afternoon I went to St. Mary's Episcopal Church at LO and Tudor to see what was going on.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8ed7/b8ed7d9d6a6feb649aee19a864bd328147fe7185" alt=""
I talked to a traffic engineer about the conflict when pedestrians "walk" signs and cars turning right both had a green light at the same time. It seemed to me this was a design problem. First he said he didn't think that happened, but he would look. Then he got rather agitated and said a problem for traffic engineers was that people didn't do what they were supposed to do. He said there was a sign saying to give pedestrians the right of way. Well, yes, but when you are driving to an intersection and you have a green light, you might not happen to see such a sign any more than you might not see a pedestrian. Especially when there are two right turn lanes and the pedestrians
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14838/14838578fdf31ed5d50332c0fdd50d5575a9f1f0" alt=""
can be hidden by the car in the far right lane. He went back to saying that you can't account for human behavior. I did suggest again it was a design flaw to give two conflicting users a green light at the same time. Why not a red right turn arrow when the "Walk" sign is lit? Or a pedestrian overpass?
This picture from the Project website doesn't show it, but the new design will have pedestrian islands which should help a little bit. Also, this turns out to be DOWL's site and Mr. Kim (below) isn't even mentioned.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac6bc/ac6bc7dcda16f570e71e77ff06dc9cb18e44f93b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84920/84920688f8a32a505f2ed427731f5ae26db0c2d0" alt=""
Here are the contact numbers if people have any questions or concerns.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59102/591027295097c3c6f5de0d3301da92b95f631b41" alt=""
Source:- whatdoino-steve
Tags: